nitrate retention capacity of milldam-impacted legacy sediments and relict a horizon soils
Clicks: 245
ID: 173207
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
245 views
35 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #4 of 11 articles by views in energy and environment
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
While eutrophication is often attributed to contemporary nutrient
pollution, there is growing evidence that past practices, like the
accumulation of legacy sediment behind historic milldams, are also important.
Given their prevalence, there is a critical need to understand how N flows
through, and is retained in, legacy sediments to improve predictions and
management of N transport from uplands to streams in the context of climatic
variability and land-use change. Our goal was to determine how nitrate
(NO3−) is cycled through the soil of a legacy-sediment-strewn stream
before and after soil drying. We extracted 10.16 cm radius intact soil
columns that extended 30 cm into each of the three significant soil horizons
at Big Spring Run (BSR) in Lancaster, Pennsylvania: surface legacy sediment
characterized by a newly developing mineral A horizon soil, mid-layer legacy
sediment consisting of mineral B horizon soil and a dark, organic-rich,
buried relict A horizon soil. Columns were first preincubated at field
capacity and then isotopically labeled nitrate (15NO3−) was
added and allowed to drain to estimate retention. The columns were then
air-dried and subsequently rewet with N-free water and allowed to drain to
quantify the drought-induced loss of 15NO3− from the different
horizons. We found the highest initial 15N retention in the mid-layer
legacy sediment (17 ± 4 %) and buried relict A soil
(14 ± 3 %) horizons, with significantly lower retention in the
surface legacy sediment (6 ± 1 %) horizon. As expected, rewetting
dry soil resulted in 15N losses in all horizons, with the greatest
losses in the buried relict A horizon soil, followed by the mid-layer legacy
sediment and surface legacy sediment horizons. The 15N
remaining in the soil following the post-drought leaching was highest in the
mid-layer legacy sediment, intermediate in the surface legacy sediment, and
lowest in the buried relict A horizon soil. Fluctuations in the water table
at BSR which affect saturation of the buried relict A horizon soil could lead
to great loses of NO3− from the soil, while vertical flow through the
legacy-sediment-rich soil profile that originates in the surface has the
potential to retain more NO3−. Restoration that seeks to reconnect
the groundwater and surface water, which will decrease the number of
drying–rewetting events imposed on the relict A horizon soils, could
initially lead to increased losses of NO3− to nearby stream waters.
| Reference Key |
weitzman2017soilnitrate
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;J. N. Weitzman;J. N. Weitzman;J. P. Kaye |
| Journal | energy and environment |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
10.5194/soil-3-95-2017
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.