the effect of some forage additives used in feeding of growing finishing pigs

Clicks: 240
ID: 173171
2011
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #127 of 249 articles by views in Enzyme and microbial technology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 249 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The experiment was carried out over a group of 50 growing finishing pigs, allotted into two equal groups. The control group (C) received a basal diet supplemented with a 2% premix – vitamins and microelements as oxides and salts mixed with maize flour-based diet; the experimental group (E) received the same diet supplemented with 2% premix made of vitamins and microelements as chelated phosphoric glass on zeolite based diet. At the end of our research it was revealed that group (E) obtained a better growing gain (12.1%), a 5.4% greater feed intake and a feed conversion rate reduction of 6.5% versus group (C).
Reference Key
polen2011scientificthe Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Enzyme and microbial technology
Year 2011
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.