similia similibus curentur: revisitando aspectos históricos da homeopatia nove anos depois similia similibus curentur: revisiting historical aspects of homeopathy nine years later

Clicks: 216
ID: 173140
2006
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #66 of 107 articles by views in biopreservation and biobanking

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
O presente texto retoma as discussões iniciadas no artigo "Simila Similibus Curentur: notação histórica da medicina homeopática" (1997), revendo desvios conceituais de outrora e aprofundando o debate histórico sobre as origens da homeopatia. A investigação se faz a partir de duas fontes principais: os textos antigos - Corpus Hippocraticum, obras de Galeno, Paracelso e Hahnemann - e os estudos elaborados por comentadores. Passados nove anos, ocorreu uma paulatina revisão dos conteúdos previamente abordados, retificação de alguns pontos e aprofundamento das discussões, permitindo um significativo amadurecimento das posições manifestas outrora. A homeopatia, 'nascida' no século XVIII, enraíza-se nas próprias origens da medicina ocidental, ao mesmo tempo em que busca florescer neste século XXI, como especialidade que deseja ser autônoma, mas que necessita da legitimação da ciência médica 'tradicional'.
Revising earlier conceptual misconstructions and delving deeper into the historical debate on the origins of homeopathy, this text returns to discussions initiated in the article "Simila Similibus Curentur: historical notes on homeopathic medicine" (1997). Research has been based on two main sources: ancient texts - Corpus Hippocraticum and works by Galen, Paracelsus, and Hahnemann - and the studies of commentators. In the nine years since original publication, previously explored content has undergone gradual revision, some points have been corrected, and discussions have developed further, lending substantially greater maturity to earlier positions. 'Born' in the eighteenth century yet rooted in the very origins of Western medicine, homeopathy is endeavoring to blossom in the twenty-first century as a specialty that wants to be autonomous but that needs the legitimacy of 'traditional' medical science.
Reference Key
corra2006histria,similia Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal biopreservation and biobanking
Year 2006
DOI
10.1590/S0104-59702006000100002
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.