in silico screening of 393 mutants facilitates enzyme engineering of amidase activity in calb
Clicks: 15
ID: 172283
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
4.2
/100
15 views
4 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #578 of 581 articles by views in pediatrics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 581 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Our previously presented method for high throughput computational screening of mutant activity (Hediger et al., 2012) is benchmarked against experimentally measured amidase activity for 22 mutants of Candida antarctica lipase B (CalB). Using an appropriate cutoff criterion for the computed barriers, the qualitative activity of 15 out of 22 mutants is correctly predicted. The method identifies four of the six most active mutants with ≥3-fold wild type activity and seven out of the eight least active mutants with ≤0.5-fold wild type activity. The method is further used to screen all sterically possible (386) double-, triple- and quadruple-mutants constructed from the most active single mutants. Based on the benchmark test at least 20 new promising mutants are identified.
| Reference Key |
hediger2013peerjin
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Martin R. Hediger;Luca De Vico;Julie B. Rannes;Christian Jäckel;Werner Besenmatter;Allan Svendsen;Jan H. Jensen |
| Journal | pediatrics |
| Year | 2013 |
| DOI |
10.7717/peerj.145
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.