communication barriers and lessons learned in energy policy
Clicks: 175
ID: 172008
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
174 views
11 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
In the past 30 years, energy researchers have concluded their academic publication with sections that deal directly with policy implications and recommendations. Yet too often, these recommendations are written with little understanding of how policymakers balance different needs, prefer to communicate, or use scientific information. In this manuscript, we outline key variables—time, training, and interpretation—that are key to understanding how to better communicate research implications to policymakers. We recommend emphasizing the power of language and the use of boundary objects in an attempt to mitigate the issues presented between researchers and policymakers.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (93 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
smith2018sustainabilitycommunication
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Hollie Smith;Christine Gilbert |
| Journal | journal of physics: conference series |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
10.3390/su10020449
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.