Crosstalk in Mechanomyographic Signals From Elbow Flexor Muscles During Submaximal to Maximal Isometric Flexion, Pronation and Supination Torque Tasks.

Clicks: 214
ID: 171428
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #18 of 18 articles by views in journal of biomechanical engineering

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study analysed crosstalk in mechanomyographic (MMG) signals from elbow flexors during isometric muscle actions from 20% to 100% maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). Twenty-five young, healthy, male participants performed isometric elbow flexion, forearm pronation and supination tasks at an elbow joint angle of 90°. The MMG signals from the biceps brachii (BB), brachialis (BRA) and brachioradialis (BRD) muscles were recorded using accelerometers. Cross-correlation coefficient was used to quantify the crosstalk in MMG signals, recorded in a direction transverse to muscle fibre axis, among the muscle pairs (P1: BB and BRA, P2: BRA and BRD and P3: BB and BRD). In addition, the MMG RMS and MPF were quantified. Mean normalized RMS and mean MPF exhibited increasing (r > 0.900) and decreasing (r < -0.900) trends, respectively, with increases in the effort levels in all three tasks. The magnitude of crosstalk ranged from 0.915 to 21.565% in all muscle pairs. Crosstalk was found to exhibit high positive correlations with submaximal to maximal flexion [P1 (r = 0.970), P2 (r = 0.951), and P3 (r = 0.824)], pronation [P1 (r = 0.811), P2 ( r = 0.763), and P3 (r = 0.901)] and supination [P1 (r = 0.898), P2 (r = 0.838), and P3 (r = 0.852)] torque levels (eight out of nine p-values were < 0.05). Regardless of the high positive correlation between crosstalk and level of effort, the crosstalk remained at a low range (0.915% to 21.565%) with increases in the torque levels.
Reference Key
talib2020crosstalkjournal Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal journal of biomechanical engineering
Year 2020
DOI
10.1115/1.4047850
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.