climate-change impacts on water resources and hydropower potential in the upper colorado river basin

Clicks: 188
ID: 170604
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #23 of 31 articles by views in wounds

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Study region: The Upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB), comprised of the Colorado and Gunnison River basins, is the prime water source for much of the western United States. Study focus: Future climate change models were used to drive a hydrologic model of the UCRB to evaluate future water resources and hydropower potential of the basin, using three different climate projections. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) emission scenarios, the A2-business as usual, and the B1-reduced emissions scenarios were evaluated. More than 4500 water diversions and 17 reservoirs were incorporated into the hydrologic model. New hydrological insights for the region: Precipitation projections from climate models vary up to 16%; flow projections revealed greater differences, up to 50%. The climate models projected increase in temperature at low elevations with extreme seasonality at high elevations, although summer temperatures increased at all elevations. The models projected a 60% decline in precipitation at lower elevations and a 74% increase at high elevations, although precipitation declined during the summer months at all elevations. Using the A2 scenario an overall decrease in annual flow was predicted, attributed to a reduction in precipitation and increasing temperature trends; however, this was not consistent during the winter months, which showed an increase in precipitation at high elevations and a modest temperature increase during the winter and resulted in an increase in stream flow. The responses to climate change on reservoir levels varied basin-wide due to variability in precipitation, evapotranspiration, and stream flow. Simulations indicated that water levels in Blue Mesa Reservoir (the largest reservoir in the UCRB) would decline by more than 70% with increasing annual temperatures. Reservoirs with smaller surface areas to the volume ratio were not significantly impacted by evapotranspiration. Our results indicate that hydropower management strategies in the UCRB must adapt to potential climate change, but the required adaptations are dependent on several factors including reservoir size and location. Keywords: Hydropower, Climate change, Hydrology, GIS
Reference Key
kopytkovskiy2015journalclimate-change Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;M. Kopytkovskiy;M. Geza;J.E. McCray
Journal wounds
Year 2015
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.