errors and mistakes in the ultrasound diagnostics of the liver, gallbladder and bile ducts
Clicks: 189
ID: 170477
2012
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
4.5
/100
15 views
15 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Ultrasonography is the most widespread imaging technique used in the diagnostics
of the pathologies concerning the organs in the abdominal cavity. Similarly to other
diagnostic tools, errors may occur in ultrasound examinations. They generally result from
inappropriate techniques, which do not conform to current standards, or erroneous interpretation
of obtained images. A significant portion of mistakes is caused by inappropriate
quality of the apparatus, the presence of sonographic imaging artifacts, unfavorable
anatomic variants or improper preparation of the patient for the examination. This article
focuses on the examiner-related errors. They concern the evaluation of the liver size,
echostructure and arterial and venous vascularization as well as inappropriate interpretation
of the liver anatomic variants and the vascular and ductal structures localized inside
of it. Furthermore, the article presents typical mistakes made during the diagnosis of the
most common gallbladder and bile duct diseases. It also includes helpful data concerning
differential diagnostics of the described pathologies of the liver, gallbladder and bile
ducts. The article indicates the most frequent sources of mistakes as well as false negative
and false positive examples which result from these errors. What is more, the norms used
in the liver, gallbladder and bile duct evaluations are presented as well as some helpful
guidelines referring to the exam techniques and image interpretation, which allows for
reducing the error-making risk. The article has been prepared on the basis of the report
published in 2005 by the Polish experts in the field of ultrasonography and extended with
the latest findings obtained from the pertinent literature.
| Reference Key |
walas2012journalerrors
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Maria Krystyna Walas;Krzysztof Skoczylas;Ireneusz Gierbliński |
| Journal | developmental psychobiology |
| Year | 2012 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.