erratum on the article ‘comments on “multiple criteria decision making (mcdm) methods in economics”: an overview’ (doi: 10.3846/20294913.2012.753489)
Clicks: 228
ID: 170274
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
228 views
37 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #10 of 12 articles by views in estudios geográficos
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
"Erratum on the article ‘Comments on “multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics”: an overview’ (DOI: 10.3846/20294913.2012.753489). " Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19(1), p Ia-Ib
First published online: 14 Mar 2013
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (29 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
liou2013technologicalerratum
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;James J. H. Liou;Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng |
| Journal | estudios geográficos |
| Year | 2013 |
| DOI |
10.3846/20294913.2013.784017
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.