clinical outcome by ames risk definition in japanese differentiated thyroid carcinoma patients

Tiklamalar: 181
ID: 169923
2007
Ucretsiz PDF
Makale Kalitesi ve Performans Metrikleri
Genel Kalite
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Yapay Zeka Kalite Degerlendirmesi
Analiz edilmedi
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #182 of 248 articles by views in journal of molecular structure

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 248 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Ozet
This study aimed to analyse whether age, metastasis, extrathyroidal invasion and size (AMES) risk definition is valuable for Japanese patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). Methods: Two hundred and fifteen Japanese DTC patients (43 men, 172 women; mean age, 51.0 years; mean follow-up, 102 months) treated surgically at our institutions between 1981 and 2001 were retrospectively analysed. Clinicopathological features were compared between high-risk and low-risk patients by AMES criteria. Various risk factors were also evaluated for each group of patients. Results: There were 57 high-risk and 158 low-risk patients. Recurrence and mortality rates were 43.9% and 24.6% in high-risk patients and 7.6% and 0.6% in low-risk patients, respectively (p < 0.0001). Disease-specific survival rates at 5, 10 and 15 years were 84.3%, 74.0% and 63.5% in high-risk patients and 100%, 100% and 98.3% in low-risk patients, respectively (p < 0.0001). Univariate analysis revealed that curative resection, local recurrence and distant metastasis were risk factors for mortality in the high-risk group. Multivariate analysis revealed that curative resection (hazard ratio [HR], 4.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-17.83; p = 0.024) and distant metastasis (HR, 4.79; 95% CI, 1.24-18.40; p = 0.023) were significantly related to mortality in high-risk patients. Conclusion: AMES can identify high-risk and low-risk Japanese patients. Distant metastasis and curative resection are prognostic factors for disease-specific death.
Referans Anahtari
wada2007asianclinical Kullanarak makale yazarken otomatik alinti icin bu anahtari kullanin SciMatic Makale Yoneticisi veya Tez Yoneticisi
Yazarlar ;Nobuyuki Wada;Shinichi Hasegawa;Yoshihiko Masudo;Shohei Hirakawa;Kenichi Matsuzu;Nobuyasu Suganuma;Hirotaka Nakayama;Yasushi Rino;Toshio Imada
Dergi journal of molecular structure
Yil 2007
DOI
10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60140-8
URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958409601408
Anahtar Kelimeler
ames

Atiflar

Atif bulunamadi. Atif eklemek icin yoneticiyle iletisime gecin: info@scimatic.org

Yorumlar

Henuz yorum yok. Bu makaleye ilk yorumu siz yapin.