grasha-richmann college students’ learning styles of classroom participation: role of gender and major
Clicks: 174
ID: 169843
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
174 views
17 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #23 of 24 articles by views in journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the american society of clinical oncology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the male and female students’
learning styles of classroom participation and these styles’ differences between
Humanities and Science majors.
Methods: 1039 individuals were selected through the proportional stratified
random sampling method among undergraduate and graduate students in
Humanities (n=421) and Science (n=618) faculties of Tehran University. In the
Humanities group, there were 285 females and 136 males, and in the Science
group, there were 208 females and 410 males. The participants answered the
Grasha-Riechmann student learning styles scale.
Results: The findings indicated that the females obtained significantly higher
means in collaborative, participative, and dependent styles than males, but in
avoidant, and independent styles, the means for males were higher than those
for females. Also, the science group’s means in collaborative, participative,
dependent, and competitive styles were significantly higher than those for the
humanities group.
Conclusion: According to the findings, it seems that due to psychological
characteristics, female students tend to collaborate with other students of
the same sex and participate in their activities. In this way, they also are more
dependent on their teacher and classroom, because otherwise they will face
some problems such as anxiety. In addition, it seems that science students in
comparison to humanities students are more participative and collaborative
because they need more collaboration in their projects and course work.
| Reference Key |
baneshi2014journalgrasha-richmann
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;ALI REZA BANESHI;MAHNAZ DEHGHAN TEZERJANI;HASAN MOKHTARPOUR |
| Journal | journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the american society of clinical oncology |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.