a brief guide to decisions at each step of the propensity score matching process

Clicks: 346
ID: 169223
2016
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #1 of 8 articles by views in transportation geotechnics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Propensity score matching techniques are becoming increasingly common as they afford applied practitioners the ability to account for systematic bias related to self-selection. However, - best practices- for implementing these techniques in applied settings is scattered throughout the literature. The current article aims to provide a brief overview of important considerations at each step of the propensity score matching process. Our hope is that this article will serve as a resource to assessment practitioners and augment previously published papers.
Reference Key
harris2016practicala Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Heather Harris;S. Jeanne Horst
Journal transportation geotechnics
Year 2016
DOI
DOI not found
URL
http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=21%26n=4
Keywords
Statistical Analysis statistical inference intervention computation

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.