fiscalization of copyright. contributions to clarifying certain issues regarding fiscalization of copyright (fiscus ubique praesens est)
Clicks: 133
ID: 168492
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
133 views
14 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #188 of 221 articles by views in Environmental monitoring and assessment
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 221 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Intellectual creations and taxes have the gift (the first) and vice (the last) to be everywhere. Intellectual creations are
sources of income for rights holders and the revenues incurred from their exploitation are, with some exceptions, taxed
everywhere under a regime of favour. In some countries, the facilities granted are so attractive that the most important creators
have established their headquarters in these „intellectual tax havens”. Researching the share of tax revenues from the
capitalization of intellectual property rights in the total budgetary revenues of Romania in the last years, as they are highlighted
in the annual budget laws, the first words spoken were: It can not! It can not be true! We can not be so low!
According to Annex no. 1 of the state budget law, from the total amount of the planned revenues to be made in 2017,
the amount of 96,825,000 lei is „income tax on the exploitation of intellectual property rights” and we find that it increased
compared to 2016 with over 10,000,000 lei (from 86,384,000 lei), the forecasts for the following years being also of growth.
Referring to the programmed amount to be made from the taxing of the results of the intellectual creation activity, we find that
the share in the total state budget revenues is 0.082% (a sum that should not be worried by its small size only if we refer to the
tax on profit of the commercial banks planned to be realized, that of 357,000,000 lei).
| Reference Key |
ro2018challengesfiscalization
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Viorel ROȘ;Andreea LIVĂDARIU |
| Journal | Environmental monitoring and assessment |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.