the evaluation of the project management programmes quality
Clicks: 156
ID: 167784
2008
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
156 views
30 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #97 of 118 articles by views in fuel
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The main issue addressed by this paper refers to the quality of training and education on project management – is it different than the perception of quality of training and education in other fields, if so, where, in what aspects, who should be responsible for it, should it only be addressed as input based - provider, trainer, curriculum, or also output based – trainee, etc. A survey was made and the main results are presented.
| Reference Key |
lu2008informaticthe
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Xiangnan LU;Narcisa CIOBOTAR;Melania-Carmen COMAN;Constanta Nicoleta BODEA |
| Journal | fuel |
| Year | 2008 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.