Commercial Insurance Coverage of Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques Compared to American Society for Radiation Oncology Model Policies.
Clicks: 392
ID: 16768
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
73.4
/100
392 views
277 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #3 of 9 articles by views in Practical radiation oncology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
To compare and contrast the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Model Policies (MPs) for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), and proton beam therapy (PBT) with the coverage policies constructed by five of the largest publicly-available commercial insurers throughout the United States (Aetna, Anthem, Cigna, Humana, United).Appropriate indications for IMRT, SRS, SABR, and PBT by disease site (and particular clinical setting thereof) were extracted from the most recently published ASTRO MPs and published coverage policies (2019 editions) of the five carriers. Following tabulation, concordance between ASTRO MPs and insurance policies were calculated for each modality.All five insurer policies supported IMRT for neoplasms of the central nervous system, head/neck, hepatopancreaticobiliary region, along with anal and prostate cancers; the least covered were retroperitoneal tumors (n=0 carriers) and bladder cancer (n=1). For SRS, all carriers covered benign brain tumors, brain metastases, arteriovenous malformations, and trigeminal neuralgia; none covered SRS for medically refractory epilepsy. For SABR, primary liver, lung, and low-/intermediate-risk prostate cancer were covered by all insurers; none allowed SABR for primary biliary neoplasms, and only one each covered SABR for primary/metastatic adrenal disease and primary renal cancer. All carriers approved PBT for ocular melanoma, skull base tumors, and pediatric malignancies. The ASTRO MP listed four PBT scenarios (spinal disease, retroperitoneal sarcoma, head/neck neoplasms, and patients with genetic radiosensitivity syndromes) not covered by any insurer. Concordance between insurance carriers and ASTRO MPs were 67.8% for IMRT, 72.0% for SRS, 58.4% for SABR, and 41.8% for PBT (p=0.005).Coverage guidelines for IMRT, SRS, SABR, and PBT vary across 5 major insurance providers and may be substantially discordant when compared to ASTRO coverage guidelines. There remain several specific areas where ongoing and future dialogue between ASTRO, payers, and policymakers remains essential.
| Reference Key |
verma2019commercialpractical
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Verma, Vivek;Ludmir, Ethan B;Mesko, Shane M;Brooks, Eric D;Augustyn, Alexander;Milano, Michael T;Lin, Steven H;Chang, Joe Y;Welsh, James W; |
| Journal | Practical radiation oncology |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
S1879-8500(19)30251-6
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.