peering into peer-review at gigascience

Clicks: 289
ID: 167641
2013
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #3 of 9 articles by views in arpn journal of engineering and applied sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract

Abstract

Fostering and promoting more open and transparent science is one of the goals of GigaScience. One of the ways we have been doing this is by throwing light on the peer-review process and carrying out open peer-review as standard. In this editorial, we provide our rationale for undertaking this policy, give examples of our positive experiences to date, and encourage others to open up the normally opaque publication process.

Reference Key
c2013gigasciencepeering Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Edmunds Scott C
Journal arpn journal of engineering and applied sciences
Year 2013
DOI
10.1186/2047-217X-2-1
URL
http://www.gigasciencejournal.com/content/2/1/1
Keywords
medical informatics computer applications to medicine

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.