the reciprocity treaty of 1883: a lost opportunity?

Clicks: 285
ID: 167085
2012
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #15 of 199 articles by views in vision research

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 199 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In January 1883, the representatives ofMexicoand theUnited Statessigned a protocol of a trade reciprocity treaty which would deregulate the exchange of some products. However, due to a strong opposition of theLouisianasugar producers, the North American senate did not ratify the protocol, leaving the treaty without effect in spite of the several extensions to achieve its final approval. The consequences of this failure had little influence over the increasing integration of both economies through commerce. However, from a dynamic perspective, this paper argues that the rejection of the reciprocity treaty diminished the incentives to invest in sugar production and exportation, an opportunity that other Latin American producers did take advantage of.
Reference Key
coln2012historiathe Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Graciela Márquez Colín
Journal vision research
Year 2012
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.