impairment in goodwill: an analysis based on accounting disclosure
Clicks: 200
ID: 166562
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
200 views
38 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #43 of 70 articles by views in sensors and actuators, b: chemical
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study aimed to verify whether Brazilian publicly traded companies published information about the goodwill impairment test between 2009 and 2011. The elaboration of a measure with compulsory disclosure items resulted in an index of compliance with the standard and permitted surveying what information the companies have disclosed. The results indicate that, in 2009, most companies did not disclose any information required for the goodwill impairment test. In 2010 and 2011, however, the percentage of companies that did not disclose anything about the procedures adopted for the test dropped. In addition, there are signs that, on average, the disclosure index increased in the course of the study period, but was very heterogeneous. Information about the discount rate and the description of the did not figure among the most disclosed information. The reflexes of a possible change in the key premise was the item whose disclosure the companies neglected most over the years. As the analysis suggests, these results may be linked with the companies’ adaptability to the impairment test procedures, but may also derive from the concentration characteristics of the companies’ control rights. In general, the increase in the disclosure percentage of the premises of the goodwill impairment test along the study period was not sufficient to reduce the disclosure differences among the companies. In addition, it could be perceived that many companies did not show consistency in the disclosure of the measure’s items between one year and the other.
| Reference Key |
barbosa2014revistaimpairment
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Josilene da Silva Barbosa;Silvia Consoni;Luciano Márcio Scherer;Ademir Clemente |
| Journal | sensors and actuators, b: chemical |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
10.17524/repec.v8i2.1028
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.