impact of different registration methods in meg source analysis
Clicks: 161
ID: 166150
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
156 views
29 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
For this study the impact of different co-registration procedures on MEG source localization of somatosensory evoked fields was evaluated. Two different co-registration procedures were used to calculate the transformation matrix which specifies how to align the MRI data to the MEG head coordinate system. In order to depict the differences, caused by the method, the Euclidian distance between the reconstructed sources was noted. It was shown that, erroneous MRI and MEG data co- registration effects source localization results. Most dipoles are located more posterior and superior when the more advanced registration procedure was applied. In conclusion the results show, that an iterative matching procedure allows an accurate knowledge of the MEG gradiometer sensor position relative to the head which is crucial to correctly reconstruct neuronal activity derived from MEG measurements.
| Reference Key |
marie2016currentimpact
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Theiß Marie;Wollbrink Andreas;Wolters Carsten H.;Brinck Heinrich |
| Journal | materials science and engineering c |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.1515/cdbme-2016-0102
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.