impact of different registration methods in meg source analysis
Clicks: 234
ID: 166150
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
234 views
65 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #57 of 96 articles by views in materials science and engineering c
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
For this study the impact of different co-registration procedures on MEG source localization of somatosensory evoked fields was evaluated. Two different co-registration procedures were used to calculate the transformation matrix which specifies how to align the MRI data to the MEG head coordinate system. In order to depict the differences, caused by the method, the Euclidian distance between the reconstructed sources was noted. It was shown that, erroneous MRI and MEG data co- registration effects source localization results. Most dipoles are located more posterior and superior when the more advanced registration procedure was applied. In conclusion the results show, that an iterative matching procedure allows an accurate knowledge of the MEG gradiometer sensor position relative to the head which is crucial to correctly reconstruct neuronal activity derived from MEG measurements.
| Reference Key |
marie2016currentimpact
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Theiß Marie;Wollbrink Andreas;Wolters Carsten H.;Brinck Heinrich |
| Journal | materials science and engineering c |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.1515/cdbme-2016-0102
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.