how to deal with cryptic species in enchytraeidae, with recommendations on taxonomical descriptions
Clicks: 133
ID: 165418
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
133 views
18 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #59 of 64 articles by views in Viruses
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
During the 12th International Symposium on Enchytraeidae, held in Tihany, Hungary (27–29 June 2016), the participants discussed cryptic species, i.e., species that are morphologically so similar that they are classified as the same species (Bickford et al. 2007), and how to deal with them taxonomically. Here we summarise the discussion together with a few additional comments, and we give recommendations for species descriptions in Enchytraeidae.
| Reference Key |
m.2017opusculahow
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Schmelz, R. M.;Beylich, A. ;Boros, G. ;Dózsa-Farkas, K.;Graefe, U. ;Hong, Y. ;Römbke, J. ;Schlaghamerský, J. ;Martinsson, S. |
| Journal | Viruses |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
10.18348/opzool.2017.S2.45
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.