social media and impression management: veterinary medicine students’ and faculty members’ attitudes toward the acceptability of social media posts
Clicks: 209
ID: 164055
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
209 views
31 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #21 of 24 articles by views in journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the american society of clinical oncology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Introduction: While social media has the potential to be used to
make professional and personal connections, it can also be used
inappropriately, with detrimental ramifications for the individual
in terms of their professional reputation and even hiring
decisions. This research explored students’ and faculty members’
perceptions of the acceptability of various social media postings.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2015.
All students and faculty members at the College of Veterinary
Medicine were invited to participate. The sample size included
140 students and 69 faculty members who completed the Social
Media Scale (SMS), a 7-point semantic differential scale. The
SMS consisted of 12 items that measured the extent to which a
variety of behaviors, using social media, constituted acceptable
and unacceptable behaviors. Items appearing on the SMS were
an amalgamation of modified items previously presented by Coe,
Weijs, Muise et al. (2012) and new items generated specifically for
this study. The data were collected during the spring semester of
2015 using Qualtrics online survey software and analyzed using
t-tests and ANOVA.
Results: The results showed that statistically significant differences
existed between the students’ and faculty members’ ratings of
acceptable behavior, as well as gender differences and differences
across class years.
Conclusion: These findings have implications for the development
of policy and educational initiatives around professional identity
management in the social sphere.
| Reference Key |
kedrowicz2016journalsocial
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;APRIL A. KEDROWICZ;KENNETH ROYAL;KEVEN FLAMMER |
| Journal | journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the american society of clinical oncology |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.