metalanguage consciousness: structure and content of the concept
Clicks: 271
ID: 163844
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
271 views
78 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #6 of 10 articles by views in revista chilena de infectologia : organo oficial de la sociedad chilena de infectologia
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
A narrow and wide understanding of the metalanguage consciousness is presented in the article as a set of metalinguistic consciousness levels, which are subconscious, verbalized and creative ones, and every level demonstrates its specificity. The author proves that subconscious and verbalized levels of metalanguage consciousness correspond to deep and surface levels of linguistic consciousness. The paper is also focused on features of metalinguistic consciousness, which embraces dual characteristics, including ontologism and gnoseologism, intuitivity and rationality, pragmatism and conceptual-terminological vagueness, prescientific and scientific character, objectivity and subjectivity; it describes main antinomies of metalinguistic consciousness: community or individuality; part or whole; creativity or automatism; common or scientific character; unconsciousness or awareness. The ratio of metalanguage consciousness levels and various areas of linguistics is characterized in terms of hierarchy of metalinguistic consciousness, provided that ordinary reflection and ordinary metalinguistic consciousness of an average native speaker are part of ordinary linguistics; scientific reflection and professional metalinguistic consciousness of a linguist are part of scientific linguistics. Accordingly, ordinary linguistics forms a linguistic (naive) picture of the world, whereas scientific linguistics - a scientific picture of the world. It is concluded that metalinguistic consciousness is a part of linguistic consciousness, but its functions overcome the intralanguage boarders.
| Reference Key |
ivannikov2018vestnikmetalanguage
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Evgeniy B. Ivannikov |
| Journal | revista chilena de infectologia : organo oficial de la sociedad chilena de infectologia |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
10.15688/jvolsu2.2018.2.16
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.