genomic sequencing capacity, data retention, and personal access to raw data in europe
Clicks: 245
ID: 163491
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
75.3
/100
244 views
192 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Whole genome/exome sequencing (WGS/WES) has become widely adopted in research and, more recently, in clinical settings. Many hope that the information obtained from the interpretation of these data will have medical benefits for patients and—in some cases—also their biological relatives. Because of the manifold possibilities to reuse genomic data, enabling sequenced individuals to access their own raw (uninterpreted) genomic data is a highly debated issue. This paper reports some of the first empirical findings on personal genome access policies and practices. We interviewed 39 respondents, working at 33 institutions in 21 countries across Europe. These sequencing institutions generate massive amounts of WGS/WES data and represent varying organisational structures and operational models. Taken together, in total, these institutions have sequenced ∼317,259 genomes and exomes to date. Most of the sequencing institutions reported that they are able to store raw genomic data in compliance with various national regulations, although there was a lack of standardisation of storage formats. Interviewees from 12 of the 33 institutions included in our study reported that they had received requests for personal access to raw genomic data from sequenced individuals. In the absence of policies on how to process such requests, these were decided on an ad hoc basis; in the end, at least 28 requests were granted, while there were no reports of requests being rejected. Given the rights, interests, and liabilities at stake, it is essential that sequencing institutions adopt clear policies and processes for raw genomic data retention and personal access.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (245 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
narayanasamy2020frontiersgenomic
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Shaman Narayanasamy;Varvara Markina;Adrian Thorogood;Adriana Blazkova;Adriana Blazkova;Mahsa Shabani;Bartha M. Knoppers;Barbara Prainsack;Barbara Prainsack;Robert Koesters |
| Journal | chemical record (new york, ny) |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
10.3389/fgene.2020.00303
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.