prudent knowledge project for a decent life and method earp: towards a democratization of legal education

Clicks: 49
ID: 163150
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This paper propose a discution about how to make similarities and differences between two proposals for participatory teaching. On one hand, the project Prudent knowledge for a decent life, effective in a southern brazilian law course, analyzed in a qualitative study with twenty-one participants and presented here by means of empirical and theoretical studies clippings. On the other hand, the teaching-learning method for Troubleshooting (EARP Method), developed here through theoretical contributions. The distinctions between both proposals relate to pedagogical structuring and organizational matters, planning and execution of activities. In both, there is a strong student participation and the democratization of the possibilities of law education.
Reference Key
henning2015revistaprudent Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Ana Clara Correa Henning;Mari Cristina de Freitas Fagundes
Journal revista de pesquisa e educação jurídica
Year 2015
DOI
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9636/2015.v1i1.12
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.