in defense of avuncularity. dennett and harris on the relation between philosophy and science
Clicks: 302
ID: 163012
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
302 views
82 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #4 of 20 articles by views in european polymer journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This metacomment on Dennett’s comment on Sam Harris’s book on free will (or the lack it) examines two issues. First, how one should conceive of the relationship between philosophy and science, in particular considering the dismissive attitude many highly regarded scientists show towards philosophy today. Second, a critical assessment of Harris’s replies to Dennett’s criticisms.
| Reference Key |
caro2017rivistain
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Mario De Caro |
| Journal | european polymer journal |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
10.4453/rifp.2017.0022
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.