Clicks: 153
ID: 162977
2011
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #13 of 22 articles by views in cardiovascular drugs and therapy

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract

The aim of the paper is a general survey of the meanings of „science“ in regard to various methodological interpretations. There were many attemps to fix the contents of the very term „science“: it could be treated as a social institute, an aggregate of steady interactions, an output of human history or a factor of social life. Science can be understood as a particular kind of social affinity, a universe of competition for status and prestige. The central topic in the investigations of science is, however, studying science as a system of knowledge of a specific type, since the basis of every interpretation of the word „science“ is knowledge, cognition, sientific knowledge or truth.

 

Reference Key
mamajeva2011santalka:what Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Tatjana Mamajeva
Journal cardiovascular drugs and therapy
Year 2011
DOI
10.3846/coactivity.2006.01
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.