development and evaluation of a portable spectrophotometer

Clicks: 233
ID: 161412
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #4 of 4 articles by views in 2019 international conference on automation, computational and technology management, icactm 2019

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Colorimetric methods, such as proteins and glucose quantification, and enzymatic assays are widely performed in biochemical laboratories employing spectrophotometer equipment. Even being present in most of the labs that serve undergraduate students, low cost and portable spectrophotometers can be a valuable tool in high schools and for field studies. OBJECTIVES: We have assembled and evaluated a portable spectrophotometer, inspired in some open projects freely available on the Internet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The system was built using an RGB LED as a light source and a light detector (TSL2561). These components were placed into the ends of a cuvette holder, which was designed in FREECAD software and fabricated in a 3D printer. The data collection system was developed using an Arduino UNO microcontroller, an LCD to show the absorbance, a micro SD card to store the results, and a push button to select the LED emitted light wavelength. All components were powered by battery bank of 2000mAh. The software was written in C++, and we used Arduino IDE 1.8.6. For the equipment evaluation, we ran protein (Bradford) and glucose (Somogyi-Nelson) essays comparing the results obtained from the developed equipment with the one used in our didactic lab (Biospectro SP-22). DISCUSSION AND RESULTS: The results obtained comparing both pieces of equipment shows a correlation coefficient of 0.99 for the both methods (Bradford and Somogyi-Nelson) in test-retest. The commercial equipment demonstrated the coefficient of variation higher than 10%, while developed spectrophotometer showed values lower than 5%. The power bank was able to supply energy to the equipment up to 12 hours. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrated high reliability for the data collected from the developed spectrophotometer. Besides the low cost, compact design and high battery autonomy. The developed equipment has presented as a valuable alternative for field experiments and in-class practices of biochemistry.
Reference Key
cndico2019journaldevelopment Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;J. P. Cândico;A. P.P. Macedo;Eduardo Galembeck
Journal 2019 international conference on automation, computational and technology management, icactm 2019
Year 2019
DOI
10.16923/reb.v17i0.893
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.