the mexican consensus on irritable bowel syndrome
Clicks: 233
ID: 161149
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
233 views
35 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #15 of 39 articles by views in Molecular brain
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Background: Since the publication in 2009 of the Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome of the Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología (2009 Guidelines), there have been significant advances in our knowledge of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of this disease.
Aims: To present a consensus review of the most current knowledge of IBS, updating the 2009 Guidelines by incorporating new internationally published scientific evidence, with a special interest in Mexican studies.
Methods: The PubMed literature from January 2009 to March 2015 was reviewed and complemented through a manual search. Articles in English and Spanish were included and preference was given to consensuses, guidelines, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Statements referring to the different aspects of the disease were formulated and voted upon by 24 gastroenterologists employing the Delphi method. Once a consensus on each statement was reached, the quality of evidence and strength of recommendation were determined through the GRADE system.
Results: Forty-eight statements were formulated, updating the information on IBS and adding the complementary data that did not appear in the 2009 Guidelines regarding the importance of exercise and diet, diagnostic strategies, and current therapy alternatives that were analyzed with more stringent scientific vigor or that emerged within the last 5 years.
Conclusions: We present herein a consensus review of the most relevant advances in the study of IBS, updating and complementing the 2009 Guidelines. Several studies conducted in Mexico were included.
| Reference Key |
carmona-snchez2016revistathe
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;R. Carmona-Sánchez;M.E. Icaza-Chávez;M.V. Bielsa-Fernández;O. Gómez-Escudero;F. Bosques-Padilla;E. Coss-Adame;F. Esquivel-Ayanegui;Á.R. Flores-Rendón;M.A. González-Martínez;F. Huerta-Iga;A. López-Colombo;T.H. Méndez-Gutiérrez;A. Noble-Lugo;J.R. Nogueira-de Rojas;R.H. Raña-Garibay;J.M. Remes-Troche;F. Roesch-Dietlen;M.J. Schmulson;J.C. Soto-Pérez;J.L. Tamayo;L.F. Uscanga;M.Á. Valdovinos;J. Valerio-Ureña;M.R. Zavala-Solares |
| Journal | Molecular brain |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.1016/j.rgmxen.2016.01.004
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.