protección financiera en salud: méxico, 1992 a 2004 financial protection in health: mexico, 1992 to 2004
Clicks: 585
ID: 159984
2005
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
585 views
60 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #16 of 219 articles by views in journal of anatomy
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 219 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
OBJETIVO: Documentar las tendencias en la protección financiera del sistema de salud en México en el periodo de 1992 a 2004, aplicando una serie de indicadores que miden el gasto en salud catastrófico y empobrecedor y el Indice de Justicia en la Protección Financiera. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: El estudio hace uso de la serie de tiempo bianual de la Encuesta de Ingresos y Gastos de los Hogares (ENIGH) en el periodo 1992 a 2004. La metodología aplicada busca medir el nivel y la distribución de la carga del financiamiento a la salud de los hogares, y la protección financiera que les ofrece el sistema de salud. Para ello, se presentan cuatro indicadores: 1) el índice de justicia en la contribución financiera; 2) la proporción de hogares con gastos catastróficos; 3) la proporción de hogares con gastos en salud empobrecedores; y 4) la suma entre el porcentaje de hogares con gastos catastróficos y empobrecedores, lo cual se denomina gastos excesivos. El análisis presentado en este documento es descriptivo, dejando para estudios posteriores el análisis de los aspectos causales a una mayor profundidad. RESULTADOS: Se estima que el número de familias con gastos en salud empobrecedores aumentó desde 5.2% en 1992 hasta alcanzar su nivel más alto de 9.9% en 1996 y posteriormente declinar en forma gradual y llegar a 1.8% en 2004. En cuanto al porcentaje de hogares con gastos catastróficos, inició en 1992 en 2.8% y aumentó a 4.2% en 1998, para posteriormente presentar una mejoría continua y llegar en 2004 a un nivel de 2.6%. La mejoría desde 2000 se concentra entre la población no asegurada, las familias afiliadas al Seguro Popular y los hogares de los dos quintiles más pobres. CONCLUSIONES: Los gastos excesivos han tenido un comportamiento que refleja un empeoramiento en el periodo de crisis económica, una mejora postcrisis y una mejoría sostenida a partir del 2000. Las cifras sugieren que una parte de la reducción en el número de hogares con gastos excesivos se debe a la ampliación de la protección financiera de las familias mexicanas que ha traído consigo el Seguro Popular de Salud, mientras otra parte se asocia a reducciones en la pobreza. También son indicativos de una importante relación entre el comportamiento de la economía en general y los gastos catastróficos y empobrecedores en salud, lo cual sugiere el importante rol del aseguramiento en salud para blindar a las familias. La protección financiera ayuda a garantizar que cuando los tiempos de crisis económica -del país o de una familia -coinciden con eventos de enfermedad, el gasto en la atención a la salud no se vuelve causa de un periodo largo o permanente de empobrecimiento para los hogares.
OBJECTIVE: To document trends in financial protection in the health care system in Mexico between 1992 and 2004, applying a series of indicators that measure catastrophic and impoverishing health spending and the Index of Fairness in Financial Contributions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study uses the biannual time series of the Survey of Household Income and Expenditures (ENIGH) spanning the period 1992 to 2004. The methodologies seek to measure the level and distribution of the burden of health care finance on households, and the financial protection offered to them by the health care system. Four indicators are presented: 1) the Index of Fairness in Financial Contributions, 2) the proportion of households with catastrophic health expenditure, 3) the proportion of households with impoverishment due to health spending and 4) the sum of the proportion of households with catastrophic or impoverishing health spending, which is referred to as excessive health spending. The analysis presented in this document is descriptive, leaving for later studies a deeper analysis of causal aspects. RESULTS: The number of families that suffer impoverishment due to health spending increased from 5.2% in 1992, reached a high of 9.9% in 1996, and then gradually declined to 1.8% by 2004. The proportion of households with catastrophic expenses began at 2.8% in 1992, increased to 4.2% in 1998 and then fell to a level of 2.6% in 2004. The improvements from 2000 on are concentrated among the uninsured population, families affiliated to Popular Health Insurance, and households in the poorest two quintiles of the income distribution. CONCLUSIONS: The patterns over time in excessive health spending reflect a worsening during periods of economic crisis, post-crisis recovery, and a sustained improvement beginning in the year 2000. The data suggest that part of the reduction in the number of households with excessive health spending is due to the extension of financial protection for Mexican families through the Popular Health Insurance, while another part is associated with a decline in poverty. In addition, this paper documents an important relationship between economic trends and catastrophic and impoverishing health spending, suggesting the importance of financially protecting families through health insurance. Financial protection assists in guaranteeing that when economic crisis of a country -or of a family- coincides with illness, health care payments do not become the cause of a long or permanent period of impoverishment for households.
OBJECTIVE: To document trends in financial protection in the health care system in Mexico between 1992 and 2004, applying a series of indicators that measure catastrophic and impoverishing health spending and the Index of Fairness in Financial Contributions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study uses the biannual time series of the Survey of Household Income and Expenditures (ENIGH) spanning the period 1992 to 2004. The methodologies seek to measure the level and distribution of the burden of health care finance on households, and the financial protection offered to them by the health care system. Four indicators are presented: 1) the Index of Fairness in Financial Contributions, 2) the proportion of households with catastrophic health expenditure, 3) the proportion of households with impoverishment due to health spending and 4) the sum of the proportion of households with catastrophic or impoverishing health spending, which is referred to as excessive health spending. The analysis presented in this document is descriptive, leaving for later studies a deeper analysis of causal aspects. RESULTS: The number of families that suffer impoverishment due to health spending increased from 5.2% in 1992, reached a high of 9.9% in 1996, and then gradually declined to 1.8% by 2004. The proportion of households with catastrophic expenses began at 2.8% in 1992, increased to 4.2% in 1998 and then fell to a level of 2.6% in 2004. The improvements from 2000 on are concentrated among the uninsured population, families affiliated to Popular Health Insurance, and households in the poorest two quintiles of the income distribution. CONCLUSIONS: The patterns over time in excessive health spending reflect a worsening during periods of economic crisis, post-crisis recovery, and a sustained improvement beginning in the year 2000. The data suggest that part of the reduction in the number of households with excessive health spending is due to the extension of financial protection for Mexican families through the Popular Health Insurance, while another part is associated with a decline in poverty. In addition, this paper documents an important relationship between economic trends and catastrophic and impoverishing health spending, suggesting the importance of financially protecting families through health insurance. Financial protection assists in guaranteeing that when economic crisis of a country -or of a family- coincides with illness, health care payments do not become the cause of a long or permanent period of impoverishment for households.
| Reference Key |
knaul2005saludproteccin
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Felicia Marie Knaul;Héctor Arreola-Ornelas;Oscar Méndez |
| Journal | journal of anatomy |
| Year | 2005 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
ZincirX productsfrom the team behind Journament
-
PatentYazar
Patent drafts for the EPO, USPTO and TürkPatent
From inventor notes to a DOCX draft: description, claims, abstract. The machine drafts, the attorney signs.
See how it works (opens in a new tab) -
Projenator
Have a project idea? Score and plan it with AI
AI scores your idea in five dimensions and builds a phased plan. Your first project is free, no card needed.
Start your first project (opens in a new tab)
Cookies
We use strictly necessary cookies to run the site and keep you signed in. With your permission we would also use Google Analytics to see how the site is used, and Google AdSense to show ads on journal and article pages. Both stay off unless you accept, and you can change your mind at any time. How we use cookies · KVKK notice (Türkiye)
Cookie settings
Your session, form security (XSRF) and this choice; if you came through a member's referral link, its code for 30 days (referral_token). Journament's own cookies only.
Google Analytics 4 (Google LLC, USA): measures which pages are visited; the _ga and _ga_* cookies are kept for up to 2 years.
Google AdSense (Google LLC, USA): shows, measures and may personalise ads on journal, article and home pages; the __gads, __gpi and __eoi cookies are kept for up to 13 months.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.