il restauro e i possibili modi per “comunicare” il patrimonio culturale / the restoration and possible ways to “communicate” cultural heritage

Clicks: 209
ID: 158919
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #25 of 50 articles by views in journal of immunology research

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Lo scenario normativo internazionale conferma il diritto di accesso alla cultura quale risorsa per la produzione di benefici, non tanto economici, ma di sviluppo sociale: in tal senso, il patrimonio “contiene” interessi e valori che determinano una responsabilità collettiva di conservazione. Nonostante partecipazione e coinvolgimento siano condizioni imprescindibili, tali valori restano solo potenziali perché non pienamente percepiti. Attraverso l’illustrazione dell’esperienza in corso sull’Isola Comacina, il contributo propone di considerare i contenuti del restauro come letture alternative per una comunicazione capace di ricostruire un rapporto tra persone e cose perché, a cavaliere tra scienze umanistiche e scienze esatte, si indaga la vita dei luoghi scoprendo la consistenza fisica degli oggetti e la conseguente continua esigenza di cura, che rimandano ad esperienze quotidiane capaci di descrivere profondamente la dimensione vitale del patrimonio culturale. The international regulatory framework confirms the right of access to culture as a resource for the production of benefits, not just economic, but linked to social development: in this sense, heritage “contains” interests and values that determine a collective responsibility in conservation. Although participation and involvement are essential conditions, these values remain only potential because not fully perceived. Through the description of the on-going experience on the Isola Comacina, the contribution proposes to consider contents of restoration as possible alternative interpretations for a communication able to rebuild a relationship between people and things because, working astride between humanities and sciences, it investigates the life of places discovering the physical aspect of objects and the need for continuing care, which refer to everyday experiences, and deeply describing the vital dimension of cultural heritage.
Reference Key
pracchi2013ilil Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Valeria Pracchi;Alessandra Chiapparini
Journal journal of immunology research
Year 2013
DOI
10.13138/2039-2362/555
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.