il restauro e i possibili modi per “comunicare” il patrimonio culturale / the restoration and possible ways to “communicate” cultural heritage
Clicks: 209
ID: 158919
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
209 views
66 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #25 of 50 articles by views in journal of immunology research
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Lo scenario normativo internazionale conferma il diritto di accesso alla cultura quale risorsa per la produzione di benefici, non tanto economici, ma di sviluppo sociale: in tal senso, il patrimonio “contiene” interessi e valori che determinano una responsabilità collettiva di conservazione. Nonostante partecipazione e coinvolgimento siano condizioni imprescindibili, tali valori restano solo potenziali perché non pienamente percepiti. Attraverso l’illustrazione dell’esperienza in corso sull’Isola Comacina, il contributo propone di considerare i contenuti del restauro come letture alternative per una comunicazione capace di ricostruire un rapporto tra persone e cose perché, a cavaliere tra scienze umanistiche e scienze esatte, si indaga la vita dei luoghi scoprendo la consistenza fisica degli oggetti e la conseguente continua esigenza di cura, che rimandano ad esperienze quotidiane capaci di descrivere profondamente la dimensione vitale del patrimonio culturale.
The international regulatory framework confirms the right of access to culture as a resource for the production of benefits, not just economic, but linked to social development: in this sense, heritage “contains” interests and values that determine a collective responsibility in conservation. Although participation and involvement are essential conditions, these values remain only potential because not fully perceived. Through the description of the on-going experience on the Isola Comacina, the contribution proposes to consider contents of restoration as possible alternative interpretations for a communication able to rebuild a relationship between people and things because, working astride between humanities and sciences, it investigates the life of places discovering the physical aspect of objects and the need for continuing care, which refer to everyday experiences, and deeply describing the vital dimension of cultural heritage.
| Reference Key |
pracchi2013ilil
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Valeria Pracchi;Alessandra Chiapparini |
| Journal | journal of immunology research |
| Year | 2013 |
| DOI |
10.13138/2039-2362/555
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.