the accuracy of reported insurance status in the meps

Clicks: 176
ID: 158841
2007
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Estimates of the number of insured and uninsured Americans are watched by numerous policymakers and the public, yet studies find respondents do not report their insurance status perfectly. Using four sources of validation data, including surveys of employers and providers, this paper assesses the quality of respondents' reports of private insurance and uninsurance in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Household Component (MEPS-HC), a nationally representative household survey. Regression analysis is used to assess the extent to which factors are associated with disagreements in reported insurance status across sources.
Reference Key
hill2007inquiry:the Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Steven C. Hill
Journal sexually transmitted infections
Year 2007
DOI
10.5034/inquiryjrnl_44.4.443
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.