teachers’ opinions on the geography secondary school curriculum
Clicks: 200
ID: 158471
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
200 views
38 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #5 of 7 articles by views in pesticides monitoring journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study was conducted due to the fact that in 2016, in Romania, the secondary school curriculum began to change. Two questionnaires were applied to teachers who taught or still teach Geography in secondary schools, in order to come up with a fundamental and operational good quality curricular document for Geography. This paper analyses teachers’ opinions on the current Geography curriculum and on its improvement. The authors of this study believe that its results should be taken into account when elaborating a new good quality Geography curriculum.
| Reference Key |
dulam2017romanianteachers
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;MARIA ELIZA DULAMĂ;IOANA MAGDAŞ;OANA-RAMONA ILOVAN |
| Journal | pesticides monitoring journal |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
doi:10.23741/RRGE120171
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.