comparison of day 2 tubal embryo transfer with day 3 embryo transfer into the uterus of intracytoplasmic sperm injection derived human embryos
Клики: 313
ID: 158440
2006
Метрики качества и эффективности статьи
Общее качество
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Вовлечённость читателей
Popular Article
30.0
/100
313 просмотры
33 читатели
Оценка качества ИИ
Не проанализировано
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #37 of 196 articles by views in spermova
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 196 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Аннотация
Objective: To compare the results of embryo transfer into the uterus (ET) performed on day 3 vs. tubal embryo transfer (TET) on day 2 in couples diagnosed with male factor infertility.
Materials and Methods: We collected data from 34 and 110 patients who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) followed by either TET on day 2 or ET on day 3 (January 2001-June 2005), respectively. All couples were diagnosed with male factor infertility; there were no tubal or uterine factors, diminished ovarian reserve, pelvic adhesions, history of polycystic ovary syndrome or previous ovarian surgery.
Results: The clinical pregnancy rates of day 2 TET and day 3 ET following ICSI were 64.71% and 57.27% (p > 0.05), respectively. The corresponding implantation rates were 35.47% and 29.58% (p > 0.05), respectively.
Conclusion: The implantation and clinical pregnancy rates of ET on the 3rd day following ICSI were similar to the rates obtained with TET 2 days after ICSI. Therefore, ET performed 3 days after ICSI should be the first choice for couples with male factor infertility, while day 2 TET remains a good alternative, especially for women with normal tubal function and known difficulties of transcervical ET.
| Ссылочный ключ |
lee2006taiwanesecomparison
Используйте этот ключ для автоцитирования в рукописи при использовании
SciMatic Manuscript Manager или Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Авторы | ;Tsai-Fang Lee;Robert Kuo-Kuang Lee;Ming-Huei Lin;Yuh-Ming Hwu;Yu-Fen Chih;Yi-Chun Tsai;Jin-Tsung Su |
| Журнал | spermova |
| Год | 2006 |
| DOI |
10.1016/S1028-4559(09)60230-8
|
| URL | |
| Ключевые слова |
Цитирования
Цитирования не найдены. Чтобы добавить цитирование, свяжитесь с администратором по адресу info@scimatic.org
Комментарии
Комментариев пока нет. Будьте первым, кто прокомментирует эту статью.