o músculo estraga a mulher? a produção de feminilidades no fisiculturismo does the muscle damage a woman? the production of femininities in bodybuilding
Clicks: 420
ID: 158427
2011
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
72.2
/100
420 views
285 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #1 of 8 articles by views in economy and sociology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Este texto analisa a relação entre a potencialização muscular e as representações de feminilidade que circulam em uma modalidade esportiva específica: o fisiculturismo. Ancora-se nos estudos culturais e em vertentes do feminismo pós-estruturalista, estabelecendo um diálogo com a teorização de Michel Foucault. As análises indicam que no esporte há um investimento para que as atletas preservem atributos culturalmente relacionados a uma representação de feminilidade normalizada. No entanto, essa recomendação não as interpela da mesma forma: algumas são capturadas por esse discurso, outras reagem e resistem indicando que uma arquitetura corporal muscularmente potencializada não estraga a mulher. Ao contrário, mostra-se como outra feminilidade, tencionando, portanto, as representações binárias de gênero.
This paper analyzes the relationship between muscle potentiation and representations of femininity involved in bodybuilding. It is anchored in cultural studies and aspects of the poststructuralist feminism establishing a dialogue with the theories of Michel Foucault. The results of the analysis indicate that there is an investment in bodybuilding so that the female athletes preserve cultural attributes related to a normalized representation of femininity. However, this recommendation does not reach all the female athletes the same way. Some of them are caught by this speech, others react and resist indicating that a muscularly potentiated body architecture does not ruin the woman. On the contrary, it is seen as another femininity which questions, therefore, the binary representations of gender.
This paper analyzes the relationship between muscle potentiation and representations of femininity involved in bodybuilding. It is anchored in cultural studies and aspects of the poststructuralist feminism establishing a dialogue with the theories of Michel Foucault. The results of the analysis indicate that there is an investment in bodybuilding so that the female athletes preserve cultural attributes related to a normalized representation of femininity. However, this recommendation does not reach all the female athletes the same way. Some of them are caught by this speech, others react and resist indicating that a muscularly potentiated body architecture does not ruin the woman. On the contrary, it is seen as another femininity which questions, therefore, the binary representations of gender.
| Reference Key |
jaeger2011revistao
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Angelita Alice Jaeger;Silvana Vilodre Goellner |
| Journal | economy and sociology |
| Year | 2011 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S0104-026X2011000300016
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.