the mechanism of “killer turn” causing residual laxity after transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Clicks: 249
ID: 157949
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
249 views
30 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #5 of 11 articles by views in zhongguo zhongyao zazhi
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Background: The residual laxity after transtibial posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction has been reported by several authors. The sharp angle where the graft exits the tibial tunnel, which is known as “killer turn”, is believed to be the main reason. The purpose of this study was to reveal the mechanism of “killer turn” and its effect on both graft and tunnel inlet.
Methods: A total of 60 New Zealand white rabbits were included. All transtibial PCL reconstructions were performed in vitro using Achilles tendon autograft. The cyclic loading tests were conducted when reconstructed knees were subjected to 1500 cycles of tensile force of 50 N with the angle of pull at 45° to the tibial plateau. The tunnel inlet enlargement, graft elongation, stiffness, graft displacement, load to failure, and failure site were all recorded and analysed.
Results: Fifty-eight New Zealand white rabbits were available for biomechanical evaluation. The subjects had significant graft elongation and tunnel enlargement. The graft displacement increased by a mean of 0.92±0.36 mm (16.70%). At the 1500th cycle, the grafts were significantly elongated by 5.59±4.98%, and the tunnel inlet diameter was also significantly enlarged by 12.08±4.31%. There was a linear correlation between total graft displacement and the two variables (R2=0.402, F=18.515, p<0.001). The coefficient for tunnel inlet enlargement was 0.419 (p=0.006), and for graft elongation was 0.583 (p=0.002). At the load-to-failure test, the failure load was 81.19±20.13 N. Of the 58 grafts, 31 (53.45%) failed at the “killer turn”, 13 (22.41%) for the para-tunnel fracture, seven (12.07%) for the graft pull-out, and the remaining seven (12.07%) for the rupture at the mounting site.
Conclusion: The mechanism of “killer turn” compromising posterior stability was that the repetitive friction between graft and tunnel inlet not only attenuated the graft, but also enlarged the tunnel inlet, leading to the displacement of the graft.
| Reference Key |
li2016asia-pacificthe
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Yue Li;Jin Zhang;Guanyang Song;Xu Li;Hua Feng |
| Journal | zhongguo zhongyao zazhi |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.1016/j.asmart.2015.12.001
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.