choices on selective clinical data sharing by people with parkinson’s disease

Clicks: 278
ID: 157216
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #7 of 11 articles by views in Brain

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Leah R Mursaleen,1,2 Jon A Stamford,1,2 Peter Schmidt,3 John M Dean,4 Richard Windle,2 David A Jones,2 Helen Matthews1,2 1The Cure Parkinson’s Trust, London, UK; 2Parkinson’s Movement, London, UK; 3National Parkinson Foundation, Parkinson’s Foundation, Miami, FL, USA; 4Davis Phinney Foundation, Boulder, CO, USA Background: Clinical data sharing and ownership are key issues in modern digital data acquisition. Data sharing is subject to influence by a range of stakeholders. Of these, patient attitudes are pivotal. Objectives: The objective of this report was to characterize attitudes to clinical data sharing among people with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods: A recent survey, conducted by the Parkinson’s Movement (2016) highlighted patient concerns over data sharing. This formed the basis for discussion by two focus groups at the Rallying to the Challenge meeting at the Van Andel Research Institute in September 2016. Results: The focus groups examined issues related to the appropriateness of data sharing for different categories of data and highlighted both the value and concerns regarding data sharing. Conclusion: At the conclusion of the session, it was proposed that a “data charter” be developed to reflect the thinking of people with PD on best practices in data acquisition, ownership, and sharing. Keywords: Parkinson’s disease, patient choice, data sharing, data acquisition, data ownership, best practices, data charter 
Reference Key
lr2017journalchoices Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Mursaleen LR;Stamford JA;Schmidt PN;Dean JM;Windle R;Jones DA;Matthews H
Journal Brain
Year 2017
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.