choices on selective clinical data sharing by people with parkinson’s disease
Clicks: 278
ID: 157216
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
278 views
41 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #7 of 11 articles by views in Brain
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Leah R Mursaleen,1,2 Jon A Stamford,1,2 Peter Schmidt,3 John M Dean,4 Richard Windle,2 David A Jones,2 Helen Matthews1,2 1The Cure Parkinson’s Trust, London, UK; 2Parkinson’s Movement, London, UK; 3National Parkinson Foundation, Parkinson’s Foundation, Miami, FL, USA; 4Davis Phinney Foundation, Boulder, CO, USA Background: Clinical data sharing and ownership are key issues in modern digital data acquisition. Data sharing is subject to influence by a range of stakeholders. Of these, patient attitudes are pivotal. Objectives: The objective of this report was to characterize attitudes to clinical data sharing among people with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods: A recent survey, conducted by the Parkinson’s Movement (2016) highlighted patient concerns over data sharing. This formed the basis for discussion by two focus groups at the Rallying to the Challenge meeting at the Van Andel Research Institute in September 2016. Results: The focus groups examined issues related to the appropriateness of data sharing for different categories of data and highlighted both the value and concerns regarding data sharing. Conclusion: At the conclusion of the session, it was proposed that a “data charter” be developed to reflect the thinking of people with PD on best practices in data acquisition, ownership, and sharing. Keywords: Parkinson’s disease, patient choice, data sharing, data acquisition, data ownership, best practices, data charter
| Reference Key |
lr2017journalchoices
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Mursaleen LR;Stamford JA;Schmidt PN;Dean JM;Windle R;Jones DA;Matthews H |
| Journal | Brain |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.