knowledge brokerage for impact assessment of land use scenarios in inner mongolia, china: extending and testing the fopia approach
Клики: 283
ID: 156950
2015
Метрики качества и эффективности статьи
Общее качество
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Вовлечённость читателей
Popular Article
30.0
/100
283 просмотры
40 читатели
Оценка качества ИИ
Не проанализировано
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #144 of 935 articles by views in journal of physics: conference series
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 935 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Аннотация
While land serves numerous societal functions and contributes to sustainable development, it is often unclear how these functions are affected by political decisions and common drivers of land use change, such as economic development, climate change and demographic change. This study evaluates alternative land use scenarios in reference to a rural region of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (China), where various processes and decisions have historically triggered unsustainable development. The scientifically tested “Framework for Participatory Impact Assessment (FoPIA)” method is developed further to address specific features of the case study region, and its function as a knowledge-brokerage (KB) tool is evaluated. Three scenarios are developed and analysed in expert workshops. “Land intensification: Agriculture” and “Land intensification: Mining” scenarios are found to have mainly negative environmental and social effects and positive economic impacts, while the “Environmental conservation and tourism” scenario is found to more positively affect all three sustainability dimensions. Assessments of methodological phases show that the FoPIA primarily serves to establish the KB process and that the framework particularly benefits from early examinations of scientific results by policy makers.
| Ссылочный ключ |
knig2015sustainabilityknowledge
Используйте этот ключ для автоцитирования в рукописи при использовании
SciMatic Manuscript Manager или Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Авторы | ;Hannes J. König;Aranka Podhora;Lin Zhen;Katharina Helming;Huimin Yan;Bingzhen Du;Jost Wübbeke;Chao Wang;Julie Klinger;Cheng Chen;Sandra Uthes |
| Журнал | journal of physics: conference series |
| Год | 2015 |
| DOI |
10.3390/su7055027
|
| URL | |
| Ключевые слова |
Цитирования
Цитирования не найдены. Чтобы добавить цитирование, свяжитесь с администратором по адресу info@scimatic.org
Комментарии
Комментариев пока нет. Будьте первым, кто прокомментирует эту статью.