correlação entre a resistência nasal e diferentes parâmetros da rinometria acústica em crianças e adolescentes com e sem rinite alérgica correlation between nasal resistance and different acoustic rhinometry parameters in children and adolescents with and without allergic rhinitis
Clicks: 324
ID: 156749
2012
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
324 views
48 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #13 of 89 articles by views in cardiovascular diabetology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Rinometria acústica e rinomanometria são importantes técnicas de avaliação da função nasal. Ainda não está definido em que extensão suas variáveis se correlacionam. OBJETIVO: Avaliar as relações entre a resistência nasal (RN) e parâmetros da rinometria acústica em crianças e adolescentes com rinite alérgica e controles. MÉTODO: Vinte pacientes com rinite alérgica e 20 controles foram avaliados. RN, volumes (V4, V5, V2-5) e menores áreas transversais (MC1, MC2) foram mensurados em três momentos: basal, após indução de obstrução nasal e após descongestionante tópico. RESULTADOS: No grupo rinite, a RN se correlacionou significantemente com todos os volumes (V5: r = -0,60) e com MC2. Nos controles, MC1 foi o parâmetro com melhor correlação com a RN no momento basal (r = -0,53) e após descongestionante. Na análise conjunta dos dados, V5 foi o que apresentou as melhores correlações, no momento basal (r = -0,53), quando obstruído (r = -0,58) e após descongestionante (r = -0,46). CONCLUSÕES: Nossos dados demonstram haver correlação negativa e significante entre os valores de rinometria acústica e RN. Em geral, os volumes apresentaram melhor correlação com a RN do que as menores áreas transversais. V5 foi a variável com melhor correlação no grupo com rinite alérgica e na análise conjunta.
Acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry are important tests used to assess nasal function. The degree to which the parameters of these tests are correlated is yet to be established. OBJECTIVE: This paper aimed to study the correlations between nasal resistance (NR) and acoustic rhinometry parameters in children and adolescents with allergic rhinitis and controls. METHOD: Twenty patients with allergic rhinitis and 20 controls were enrolled. NR, volumes (V4, V5, V2-5), and minimal cross-sectional areas (MC1, MC2) were measured in three moments: baseline, after induction of nasal obstruction and after topical decongestant administration. RESULTS: Patients with allergic rhinitis had significant correlation between NR and all volumes (V5: r = -0.60) and with MC2. Among controls, MC1 was the parameter with the strongest correlation with NR at baseline (r = -0.53) and after decongestant administration. In the combined analysis, V5 had the highest correlation coefficients at baseline (r = -0.53), after obstruction (r = -0.58) and after decongestant (r = -0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that NR and acoustic rhinometry parameters have negative and significant correlations. Nasal volumes are, in general, better correlated than minimal cross-sectional areas. V5 was the parameter with the highest correlation in the rhinitis group and in the combined analysis.
Acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry are important tests used to assess nasal function. The degree to which the parameters of these tests are correlated is yet to be established. OBJECTIVE: This paper aimed to study the correlations between nasal resistance (NR) and acoustic rhinometry parameters in children and adolescents with allergic rhinitis and controls. METHOD: Twenty patients with allergic rhinitis and 20 controls were enrolled. NR, volumes (V4, V5, V2-5), and minimal cross-sectional areas (MC1, MC2) were measured in three moments: baseline, after induction of nasal obstruction and after topical decongestant administration. RESULTS: Patients with allergic rhinitis had significant correlation between NR and all volumes (V5: r = -0.60) and with MC2. Among controls, MC1 was the parameter with the strongest correlation with NR at baseline (r = -0.53) and after decongestant administration. In the combined analysis, V5 had the highest correlation coefficients at baseline (r = -0.53), after obstruction (r = -0.58) and after decongestant (r = -0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that NR and acoustic rhinometry parameters have negative and significant correlations. Nasal volumes are, in general, better correlated than minimal cross-sectional areas. V5 was the parameter with the highest correlation in the rhinitis group and in the combined analysis.
| Reference Key |
wandalsen2012braziliancorrelao
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Gustavo Falbo Wandalsen;Aline Inês Mendes;Dirceu Solé |
| Journal | cardiovascular diabetology |
| Year | 2012 |
| DOI |
10.5935/1808-8694.20120038
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.