Intercapitalist Maneuvers and the ICD-10 Transition: The Instrumental Role of the State in the Corporate Governance of U.S. Health Care.
Clicks: 454
ID: 15650
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
66.6
/100
454 views
338 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #1 of 11 articles by views in international journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In 2015, the United States transitioned to the ICD-10-CM/PCS, a comprehensive updated coding system for medical reimbursement. This transition was part of a larger move toward value-based reimbursement in U.S. health care and required nearly 2 decades of planning. As an unfunded mandate from Congress, it created a substantial financial burden for many groups within the health sector. This article traces the ICD-10 transition using the concept of the corporate governance of health care, attending to the role the state plays in mediating intercapitalist maneuvers. The ICD-10 was not a simple top-down declaration originating in a neutral state. Rather, it was produced and modified through lobbying efforts on the part of various stakeholders who, along with their competitors, would be affected by the transition in differential ways. The health information technology industry, in particular, stood to gain the most from this transition, at the expense of other capitalist players. An examination of the intercapitalist maneuevers behind the ICD-10 transition demonstrates that even when corporate powers govern U.S. health care, the role of the state should not be written off as inconsequential but rather interrogated and analyzed in relation to the corporate interests with which it is entangled.
| Reference Key |
bugbee2019intercapitalistinternational
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Bugbee, Mary; |
| Journal | international journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1177/0020731419848294
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.