the introduction of the guarantee judge in brazil and the electronic police inquiry

Clicks: 167
ID: 155669
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #12 of 13 articles by views in journal of adolescent health

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
A “judge of guarantees” is a magistrate who acts only in the investigation phase, assessing the legality of the acts and deciding personal and real precautionary measures. Its adoption seeks to avoid psychological contamination of the magistrate, who will judge an eventual process. Introduced in Brazil by Law 13.964/2019, it is being challenged in four direct actions of unconstitutionality. In a preliminary decision, minister Fux accepted the intention to suspend the rules included in the Code of Criminal Procedure, for an indefinite period. Among them, art. 3º-D, which proposes the creation of a system of rotation of magistrates in the counties where only one judge works, as a solution to make the presence of the “judge of guarantees” feasible in the interior of the country. The central argument for this decision was the undue interference of the Legislative Power in the budgetary autonomy and self-management of the Judiciary, added, both to the high cost of hiring new magistrates, prosecutors, police officers and public defenders, as well as the routine expenses with daily physical displacement of these professionals. This article aims to present the adoption of the electronic police inquiry as a mitigation for the costs of implantation of the “judge of guarantees” in Brazil, neutralizing the discussion of the constitutionality of art. 3rd-D in the Federal Supreme Court.
Reference Key
guimares2020revistathe Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Rodrigo Régnier Chemim Guimarães;Sarah Ribeiro
Journal journal of adolescent health
Year 2020
DOI
10.22197/rbdpp.v6i1.329
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.