o inconsciente freudiano: as marcas da segunda tópica the freudian's unconscious: the marks of the second theory
Clicks: 112
ID: 155264
2004
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
112 views
18 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #68 of 80 articles by views in investigative ophthalmology & visual science
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Interrogaremos os alcances e os limites da práxis analítica com a inclusão da Eindruck freudiana, em sua relação e diferença com os rastros mnêmicos. Enquanto os rastros remetem à pura diferença que cada um introduz em relação a si mesmo e a outros, a Eindruck nos antecipa que o inconsciente não faz um todo, não completa um universo. Assim, situaremos qual é o modo de inscrição desse inconsciente estruturado como uma linguagem, que obedece a uma lógica na qual domina o Um, pois cada marca é uma. Isto é, o modo de inscrição desse Zeitlos, tão "não sabido" como o inconsciente.
We will analyze the scopes and limits of the analytical praxis including the Freudian Eindruck, in relation to and in comparison with the mnemic traces. While the traces lead to the pure difference that each one introduces in relation to itself and to another; on the other hand, the Eindruck tells us in advance that the unconscious does not constitute a whole; it does not complete a universe. Therefore, we will inquire into the modus of inscription of the unconscious structured like a language, which responds to a logic ruled by the One, since each mark is one. So, the modus of inscription of that Zeit-los, as "unknown" as the unconscious.
We will analyze the scopes and limits of the analytical praxis including the Freudian Eindruck, in relation to and in comparison with the mnemic traces. While the traces lead to the pure difference that each one introduces in relation to itself and to another; on the other hand, the Eindruck tells us in advance that the unconscious does not constitute a whole; it does not complete a universe. Therefore, we will inquire into the modus of inscription of the unconscious structured like a language, which responds to a logic ruled by the One, since each mark is one. So, the modus of inscription of that Zeit-los, as "unknown" as the unconscious.
| Reference Key |
cosentino2004gora:o
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Juan Carlos Cosentino |
| Journal | investigative ophthalmology & visual science |
| Year | 2004 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S1516-14982004000200004
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.