spectra optia apheresis system: experience with secondary plasma devices

Clicks: 148
ID: 154992
2017
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Silke Rummler,1 Sabine Volkholz,1 Thomas Steinke,2 Katrin Maier,1 Heike Jütte,1 Agnieszka Hilge,1 Patrice Ziehm1 1Institute of Transfusion Medicine, 2Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany Abstract: Performing clinical procedures and optimal management of Spectra Optia in combination with secondary plasma devices (SPDs) have not been described in the literature. To contribute to this topic, we examined 300 data log files from patients treated with the Spectra Optia from November 2015 until October 2016. Of these 300 procedures, 149 secondary plasma treatments were conducted in 13 patients (76 immunoadsorption [IA] and 73 lipoprotein apheresis [LA]). Nine patients had IA due to transplantation and autoimmune diseases. Four patients were treated with LA after heart transplantation. Of the procedures, 62% were performed using peripheral venous access, even in patients with a low inlet blood flow. A central catheter was required only in 15% cases, and an arteriovenous fistula in 23% of the procedures. Anticoagulation management differed in both procedures. The LA procedures required a higher amount of citrate as they were performed using only citrate. The IA procedures required less citrate because a mixture of citrate and heparin was used. We did not observe clotting or bleeding, regardless of heparin use. Due to strict calcium management, no patient showed signs of hypocalcemia. Despite our apheresis management, four procedures had to be canceled preliminarily due to patient complications. The targeted substances could be reduced significantly: lipoprotein (a) (Lpa) level by 68% (76%–45%), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol by 57% (64%–37%), and IgG from 6.6 (1.09–21.0) to 2.61 (0.33–14.7) g/l. The Cobe could be replaced by the Optia system effectively. The Optia has a high plasma extraction efficiency, which allows SPD procedures with peripheral venous access and moderate inlet flow rates. Keywords: adverse events, anticoagulation, peripher venous access, lipoprotein apheresis, immunoadsorption
Reference Key
s2017internationalspectra Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal international journal of clinical transfusion medicine
Year 2017
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.