sample storage conditions induce post-collection biases in microbiome profiles
Clicks: 299
ID: 154684
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
299 views
29 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #6 of 8 articles by views in forum ilmu sosial
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background Here we investigated the influence of different stabilization and storage strategies on the quality and composition of the fecal microbial community. Namely, same-day isolated murine DNA was compared to samples stored for 1 month in air at ambient temperature, with or without preservative buffers (i.e. EDTA and lysis buffer), different temperatures (i.e. 4 °C, − 20 °C, and − 80 °C), and hypoxic conditions. Results Only storage in lysis buffer significantly reduced DNA content, yet without integrity loss. Storage in EDTA affected alpha diversity the most, which was also reflected in cluster separation. Distinct changes were also seen in the phyla and bacterial species abundance per storage strategy. Metabolic function analysis showed 22 pathways not significantly affected by storage conditions, whereas the tyrosine metabolism pathway was significantly changed in all strategies except by EDTA. Conclusion Each long-term storage strategy introduced a unique post-collection bias, which is important to take into account when interpreting data.
| Reference Key |
jenkins2018bmcsample
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Samir V. Jenkins;Kieng B. Vang;Allen Gies;Robert J. Griffin;Se-Ran Jun;Intawat Nookaew;Ruud P. M. Dings |
| Journal | forum ilmu sosial |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
10.1186/s12866-018-1359-5
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.