The problem with delineating narrow criteria for citizen science.

Clicks: 221
ID: 15465
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #174 of 292 articles by views in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 292 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract is not available for this article.
Login to Search Abstract
Reference Key
auerbach2019theproceedings Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Auerbach, Jeremy;Barthelmess, Erika L;Cavalier, Darlene;Cooper, Caren B;Fenyk, Heather;Haklay, Mordechai;Hulbert, Joseph M;Kyba, Christopher C M;Larson, Lincoln R;Lewandowski, Eva;Shanley, Lea;
Journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Year 2019
DOI
10.1073/pnas.1909278116
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.