notes towards the analysis of metaphor
Clicks: 75
ID: 154542
2000
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
22.2
/100
75 views
7 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #697 of 729 articles by views in molecules
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 729 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
G. LAKOFF and M. JOHNSON's theory of cognitive linguistics and their definition of metaphor and metaphorical concepts have led to a variety of qualitative approaches whose common aim is to reconstruct metaphorical concepts and metaphorical reasoning in everyday language. Targets of these approaches were cross-cultural, cultural, subcultural, individual matters and metaphoric interaction. To illustrate this, two different strategies for a systematic procedure are briefly outlined. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0001206
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (70 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
schmitt2000forum:notes
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Rudolf Schmitt |
| Journal | molecules |
| Year | 2000 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.