religiosity and readiness for reconciliation: an anthropological view
Clicks: 253
ID: 154503
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
9.0
/100
30 views
30 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
This paper is an anthropological study of processes that lead to the
traumatization of a society, and of processes that result in forgiveness and
reconciliation as chosen ways of dealing with post-conflict situations. The
area on which the research is focused is Southeastern Europe, or more
precisely Croatian and Serbian societies and relations. As cultural
anthropology has not developed any special theory to deal with the causes of
traumatic experiences in cultures and societies, this study uses the
conceptions of closely related cultural sociology, formulated in Jeffrey
Alexander's works. According to Alexander cultural trauma occurs when
members of a collectivity feel they have been subjected to a horrendous
event that leaves indelible marks upon their group consciousness, marking
their memories forever and changing their future identity in fundamental and
irrevocable ways. Insofar as they identify the cause of trauma, and thereby
assume such moral responsibility, members of collectivities define their
solidary relationships in ways that allow them to share the sufferings of
others. In thinking that the suffering of others might also be our own
societies expand the circle of the we. According to the same theory, when
social groups refuse to recognize the existence of others' trauma and
suffering, they not only diffuse their own responsibility for the suffering
but often project the responsibility for their own suffering on these
others. It is necessary then, for any process of reconciliation to be
successful, that groups recognize suffering of others and their own
responsibility. From the fact that social groups might refuse to participate
in the process of trauma creation, it is obvious that trauma does not exist
naturally, but that trauma is a social construction, a socially mediated
attribution. This paper and research are also designed as an anthropological
comparison with a huge sociological research of religiosity in Croatia done
in 2000, partly also focused on the topic of reconciliation. Anthropological
research of young believers for this paper was conducted in 2014 and 2015 in
Croatia, with interview used as the main research method. The main results
show that: there still exists an important difference between proclaimed and
practical believers; both Catholic Church in Croatia and Serbian Orthodox
Church are expected to work on forgiveness and reconciliation; ecumenism is
highly valued; readiness for taking part in common Catholic-Orthodox
meetings and services is ubiquitous; and that the readiness to forgive and
conciliate is real and substantial. The research confirmed the vision of
youth believers as a group that is especially ready to conciliate and
actively work on the processes of reconciliation and forgiveness, and that
there is a solid basis for the success of these processes in contemporary
Croatian society.
| Reference Key |
pavel2015glasnikreligiosity
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Šantek Goran Pavel |
| Journal | infectious diseases |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
10.2298/GEI1502265S
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.