diff erence and identity: two paradigms of patristic philosophy

Clicks: 207
ID: 151472
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #16 of 21 articles by views in pasavento

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
My main thesis looks as follows. Two fundamental paradigms were developed in Christian culture in the 4th с. AC. and largely determine philosophical and theological thought in East and West: 1) the identity paradigm, which became widespread in the West after Augustine, involves the identification of essence and predicates in God; 2) the paradigm of difference, which became widespread in the East thanks to Cappadocian Fathers, involves fundamental difference between essence and predicates in God. These approaches are not only private theological opinions, but lie at the beginning of the two branches of the Christian metaphysics. I argue that identity paradigm is imperfect from theological and philosophical points of view, while the paradigm of difference has a rich philosophical and theological potential, however, it has not been studied suffi ciently.
Reference Key
aleksei2016vestnikdiff Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Gaginskii Aleksei
Journal pasavento
Year 2016
DOI
10.15382/sturII201671.21-28
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.