the spectator without a subject. hazards and cracks in the society of the spectacle.

Clicks: 193
ID: 150166
2011
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #1 of 3 articles by views in hybris: revista de filosofía

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract

The article takes the notion of society of the spectacle, given by Debord and interrogated abouttheir political functionality, particularly at the prospect that the art is an emancipating or liberatingexperience, that allows to put in check the spectacle as aesthetic form. For this, assumes the idea ofspectacle in dialogue critical with the perspective proposed by Rancière and Jauss. Firstly, as regards thereleasing ability of aesthetic experience, and secondly, with regard to the possibilities of the spectator, asemancipated spectator.

Reference Key
vargas2011hybris:the Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Paula Poblete Vargas
Journal hybris: revista de filosofía
Year 2011
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.