the spectator without a subject. hazards and cracks in the society of the spectacle.
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Readership in this journal
StarRanked #1 of 3 articles by views in hybris: revista de filosofía
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
Abstract
The article takes the notion of society of the spectacle, given by Debord and interrogated abouttheir political functionality, particularly at the prospect that the art is an emancipating or liberatingexperience, that allows to put in check the spectacle as aesthetic form. For this, assumes the idea ofspectacle in dialogue critical with the perspective proposed by Rancière and Jauss. Firstly, as regards thereleasing ability of aesthetic experience, and secondly, with regard to the possibilities of the spectator, asemancipated spectator.
| Reference Key |
vargas2011hybris:the
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Paula Poblete Vargas |
| Journal | hybris: revista de filosofía |
| Year | 2011 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.