the spectator without a subject. hazards and cracks in the society of the spectacle.
Clicks: 144
ID: 150166
2011
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
5.7
/100
19 views
19 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
The article takes the notion of society of the spectacle, given by Debord and interrogated abouttheir political functionality, particularly at the prospect that the art is an emancipating or liberatingexperience, that allows to put in check the spectacle as aesthetic form. For this, assumes the idea ofspectacle in dialogue critical with the perspective proposed by Rancière and Jauss. Firstly, as regards thereleasing ability of aesthetic experience, and secondly, with regard to the possibilities of the spectator, asemancipated spectator.
| Reference Key |
vargas2011hybris:the
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Paula Poblete Vargas |
| Journal | hybris: revista de filosofía |
| Year | 2011 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.