decomposition and interpretation of mueller matrices
Clicks: 52
ID: 150144
2010
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
15.3
/100
52 views
10 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
StarRanked #517 of 625 articles by views in utilitas mathematica
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 625 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The various decompositions of depolarizing Mueller matrices into products of basic optical devices, i.e. retarders, diattenuators and depolarizers, are critically revisited. Both “classic” as well as recently proposed factorizations are overviewed. The “depolarization aspect” is given a special attention. Experimental matrices are factorized and physically interpreted using the different decompositions. The problems of physical realizability and matrix filtering are treated in connection with the sum decomposition of a depolarizing Mueller matrix.
| Reference Key |
r.2010epjdecomposition
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Ossikovski R. |
| Journal | utilitas mathematica |
| Year | 2010 |
| DOI |
10.1051/epjconf/20100504005
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.