la flexibilización en la jurisprudencia

Clicks: 199
ID: 150128
2014
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #91 of 148 articles by views in Toxins

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 148 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract

Es sabido que las corrientes doctrinarias son filtradas por la jurisprudencia recogiéndolas o rechazándolas, a través de un proceso que puede durar varios años, por lo cual, es dificil determinar cuando se consolidan efectivamente, se alteran, adaptan o se desconocen.
Las posturas flexibilizadoras en el derecho del trabajo, en sus diferentes versiones,
aparecen en la década de los 80, por lo que se consideró oportuno examinar la jurisprudencia de mediados de la década siguiente, a efectos de dbservar si los criterios flexibilizadores eran receptados, en qué medida y en cuáles aspectos.

Reference Key
artecona2014revistala Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Martha Abella de Artecona
Journal Toxins
Year 2014
DOI
DOI not found
URL
http://www.revistafacultadderecho.edu.uy/ojs-2.4.2/index.php/rfd/article/view/282
Keywords
comparative and uniform law jurisprudencesocial sciences (general) flexibilizaciónlaw in general

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.